|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] AntiVirus solution for FW1?
One issue with these products is that they are Memory, CPU and disk pigs!! Below is the minimum recommended configuration for the email scanner portion of the software that I received from an engineer at Trend Micro. In the documentation, it says these products require 9GB of disk without quantification based on usage and platform. I have been testing the product and I like it, but I do not think I would want to put it on my Firewall machines. I would suggest putting it on separate machines, especially if you have a lot of network traffic and expect the Trend products to be really busy. Hardware recommendations based on number of emails per day. Problem : What are hardware requirements for Interscan SOLARIS based on email traffic? solution : The following table is based on the assumption that less than 20% of all E-mail messages contain attachments. E-mails/day Computer(SUN) # processors RAM Hard Disk 1000-3500 Ultra 5 1 64MB 2GB 3000-7000 Ultra 5 1 128MB 2GB 7500-10000 Ultra 1 1 128MB 2GB 10000-20000 Ultra 1 1 128MB 2GB 20000-40000 Ultra 1 1 128MB 2GB 40000-75000 Ultra 2 2 256MB 4GB 75000-100000 Ultra 2 2 512MB 8GB For other Unix platforms, please use the sizing for Sun and use comparable systems from those vendors. Best regards, MJ Marc Jacquard SR. Systems Engineer CCSA Fujitsu America, INC. Hilo Office email: [email protected] Telephone:Pager:-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of CryptoTech Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 10:11 AM To: Zinski, Steve Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: Re: [FW1] AntiVirus solution for FW1? I also use esafe, and have been very pleased. "Zinski, Steve" wrote: > Hello, I posted a message several days ago about problems we are having with > Symantec's Norton AntiVirus for Firewalls (v1.5) working with our FW1. I > received several messages from other people having the same problems which > leads me to believe that Symantec's NAV product is simply not ready for > prime time. :-( > > I am working with Trend Micro, maker of VirusWall, to evaluate and possibly > purchase their product. Several people recommend this solution for scrubbing > SMTP traffic at the firewall. Although I do plan to install and test their > 30-day eval, I'd like to get the opinion of others who are actually running > Trend's product. Are you satisfied with the performance of VirusWall? Are > there any problems that I should watch out for? Any information would be > greatly appreciated. > > Steve Zinski > Senior Network Specialist > University of Richmond, Virginia > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
