[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [FW1] SecuRemote license woes
> You need to have an encryption license > -- and -- > you need to have a SecuRemote license. Why the @#$(%28$#%@#$*&% do they do this? I HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE the CheckPoint licensing scheme, architecture, etc., etc. I have never ever had an interaction with CheckPoint having to do with licensing that didn't take weeks to resolve. If the component is free, why doesn't it just work when I have a vpnstrong license that allows it to be free? Why make me jump through more hoops just to get something that the software should ALREADY know I am licensed for? THis is the most brain-dead setup I've ever heard of? And on that note, why do WE put up with all of this crap? I have heard sooooo many people complaining about CheckPoint licensing fiascos. I certainly would never ever purchase a CheckPoint product again after the hideous experiences I've had with licensing. Nothing is worth this nightmare. (I'm currently stuck between a 4.0 installation that has an expired license, and a 4.1 installation with a permanent license, but no SEcuRemote license yet.... and I've got remote users just hanging in the wind. Not to mention that they've screwed up my software subscription, and I've suddenly lost access to all of the download areas.) -Rick +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Rick Osterberg [email protected] | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|