[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] RE: FW Licensing issues
What if the firewall had 4 interfaces? One for each of the external nets, and one for each of the internal nets, and did NAT for both internal nets? > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > CryptoTech > Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 7:26 PM > To: Colin Falconer > Cc: Checkpoint Fw-1-Mailinglist (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [FW1] RE: FW Licensing issues > > > > Well, Firewall aside, could you do this with any routing > mechanism? Short of MPLS, > it is out of the question. > > Colin Falconer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have two leased lines (going to two routers, 62.x.x.x, > 194.x.x.x), and one > > Firewall 1 (stand alone, registered with 194.x.x.x). > > Is there any way I can get eg. one internal network to use > the 194.x.x.x > > gateway and another network to use the 62.x.x.x gateway > (via another net > > card with a legal IP 62.x.x.x. > > > > Any help appreciated. > > Colin. > > > > > ============================================================== > ================== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the > instructions at > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > > > ============================================================== > ================== > > > > ============================================================== > ================== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the > instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================== > ================== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|