NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [FW1] routes ?



If you need people to access the 212.x addresses from the public internet
then the route will be required on the Cisco box.
I hope these addresses have been changed, by the looks of them they have as
I would expect them to be from the same class C. It has been said before
here many times, it is not a good idea to put real IP address out on these
kind of lists. They are public and everyone would then know what your router
and Firewall IP addresses are. 
Some people love to get their hands on this kind of info, it wouldn't be to
hard to get the ip of your DNS, FTP and mail server from this info either. 

Hope the info helps,

Russell Goodwin


-----Original Message-----
From: Alberto Díaz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 02 November 2000 18:05
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FW1] routes ?



	Hi,

	I have the FireWall-1 Gateway and my system is:

		Internet
		   |
		 Router
		   |
		   | (1)
		  FW1
		   |
		   | (2)
		   |
        --------------
	 |      |       |
	 |      |       |
      serv.  Serv.   Serv.
	web	 mail   DNS,FTP

	the segment net (1) is: 210.160.188.0 / 255.255.255.240
	and the segment net (2) is: 212.170.188.16 / 255.255.255.240

	The ethernet interface in the Cisco router has the ip =
210.160.188.1 and
the external interface in the firewall 	is 210.160.188.2 I have a static
rule in the CISCO router
		ip route 212.170.188.16 255.255.255.240 210.160.188.2

	With this rule all traffic to the segment (2) is routed to the
firewall and
the firewall filters that traffic.

	Is it necessary to route the trafic to the firewall or can I remove
this
static rule in the router and in the firewall? Could the firewall work fine
without the static rule in the router?

	-----------------------------------------------
XXXXXXXXXXX   -------------------------------------------

	And if I used NAT in the FireWall with rules like this
		source		destination	service	|	source
destination	service
		   any	      210.160.188.5	   any	|	   any
212.170.188.20	 any
		   any         210.160.188.8	   any    |	   any
212.170.188.19	 any

	would it be necessary a static rule like this in the router?

		ip route 210.160.188.0  255.255.255.240  210.160.188.2

	---------------------------------------------
 XXXXXXXXXXX  ----------------------------------------------

	Thank You.







============================================================================
====
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.