|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] FW-1 plus load-balancing
Is your VPN primarily SecuRemote users, nailed-up FW-2-FW tunnels, or a combination of both? How many of each? Mark L. Decker Rainfinity [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Thomas Nau Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 10:29 PM To: Cedric Amand Cc: Thomas Nau; FW-1 mailing list Subject: Re: [FW1] FW-1 plus load-balancing Hmm, 30 rules are a good guess but 20+ are tooo many. The goal would be in the 2-4 range. I'll have to look in products like SUN's screen which is supposed to support multi-CPU nodes but doesn't offer load balancing between boxes as far as I know. Thomas On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Cedric Amand wrote: |Hello Thomas, | |TN> 2. which products would you recommend from the performance and |TN> scalability point of viev? VPN is bo real issue so mainly packet |TN> filtering inf the 400-1000Mbit range must be offered. | |then, in real life, you're heading at 20+ firewalls in parallel |for a medium (30 rules) ruleset. | |My 2 cent. | | | ====== PGP fingerprint B1 EE D2 39 2C 82 26 DA A5 4D E0 50 35 75 9E ED ====== Thought you got rid of all year 2k bugs and problems? Here's a new one: Windows 2000 ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
