[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] FW-1 plus load-balancing
The load balancing features built into FW1 are showing their age. They just don't work all that well. They did give us a solution when no one else had one, but these days I think that most people would agree that a 3rd party load-balancing solution makes much more sense. One example of how CheckPoints product seems to misbehave is when a server goes off-line (down) the load balancing engine does not seem to realize this and continues to send connections to it anyway. The CheckPoint Load balancing is handled in software and in some cases you load an agent on the web servers that you are balancing. There is no need to setup OSPF or anything silly like that. You basically assign a "virtual" address for the "group" of servers that you want to balance and then assign the servers into a group. Your DNS entry points to that virtual address and the firewall will pick the destination IP address and will (kind-of) NAT that connection to the destination. I would say that the CheckPoints solution to the problem isn't really viable in today's environments. Maybe if you just need simple load balancing it might be ok. This is just HTTP load balance, not firewall load balancing I'd look into the slue of hardware based load balancing solutions out there. Cisco ( http://www.cisco.com ) , Alteon ( http://www.alteonwebsystems.com/ ), Rainfinity, Stonesoft, Foundry, ArrorPoint. There are about 100 of them it seems. Checkout the OPSEC section of checkpoints web page for a more complete list. http://www.checkpoint.com/opsec/performance.html#HA_Load_Balancing Good Luck. Will -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Thomas Nau Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:33 AM To: FW-1 mailing list Subject: [FW1] FW-1 plus load-balancing Hi there. Two questions about HA and load-balancing solutions: 1. if FW-1 is setup to do LB, is there need for additional hardware like a load-balancing switch? How does LB work with routing? Do we need to setup OSPF with multiple default routes to the outside or how does the cluster handle this on a technical base? 2. which products would you recommend from the performance and scalability point of viev? VPN is bo real issue so mainly packet filtering inf the 400-1000Mbit range must be offered. Thanks, Thomas ====== PGP fingerprint B1 EE D2 39 2C 82 26 DA A5 4D E0 50 35 75 9E ED ====== Thought you got rid of all year 2k bugs and problems? Here's a new one: Windows 2000 ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|