[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [FW1] VPN Client Difference's
Microsoft's L2TP IP-Sec based VPN does not support NAT. If you are using
NAT in your environment, you're out of luck.
The Checkpoint VPN solution is far more elegant, not to mention that you
have a centralized point of administration for access to and from your
network.
-Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 9:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FW1] VPN Client Difference's
Does anyone know what are the advantages of the New SecuRemote SP2 over
Windows
2000 Native IPSec client.
I need to know the pro and cons.
The reason is we are trying to decide what type of client to use for a VPN
solution (Windows 2000 builtin IPsec client or Check Points)
We currently have a Nokia Check Point solution and want to implement a
client
VPN solution for our traveling users.
Those users are running Windows 2000 on a laptop. There are around 500+
Thanks for you help
Alberto
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================