NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [FW1] Why choose Nokia? Here's why.






Hi,

> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:53 PM
> Subject: RE: [FW1] Why choose Nokia? Here's why.
>
> <snip>
>> However, he was somewhat misleading in his comparison of Stonebeat to
>> Nokia's.
> <snip>
>
>Can you extrapolate on that?

Sure.

I meant that there's a difference between comparing the StoneBeat HA solution -
which is very similar to Nokia with hot-standby or load-sharing configurations,
basic two-node failover support, etc. - and having a comparison with StoneBeat
FullCluster, which, unlike the Nokia platform, performs dynamic load-balancing,
scales up to 16 nodes per cluster, and operates with your choice of Solaris, NT
or Linux.  I just wanted it to be clear that Stonesoft offers two solutions for
achieving HA with Check Point boxes.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Boltz                                       Stonesoft, Inc.
Network Security Specialist           115 Perimeter Center Place
[email protected]              South Terraces, Suite 1000
Tel:Atlanta, GA 30346
Cel:USA
Fax:http://www.stonesoft.com




================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents � 2003 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.