|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] Why choose Nokia? Here's why.
Great point Mark, however most companies are not ready to choose a solution not in the top 3, even if it works better or saves them money! I agree however that the lack of load balancing capabilities is a very limiting factor. Is Rainwall, which I have heard a lot about, in or near the top 3? Perhaps I should review it if it is. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Decker" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:12 PM Subject: RE: [FW1] Why choose Nokia? Here's why. > Point of correction: > > To be fair, the VRRP-based hot-standby solution offered by Nokia > shouldn't be compared with HA solutions costing $12k or more. For that > much money, you can get something like Rainwall-E, which offers dynamic > load balancing and performance gains not possible with VRRP. It would > be more accurate to compare Nokia's HA solution with a basic HA product > like Rainwall-S, which sells for only $5k. > > That said, Nokia has a very convenient package overall. > > Mark L. Decker > Rainfinity > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> > Scott Schindler wrote: > > >Built in High availability. How much is Stonebeat? Check Point's > solution? ($12000 - $20000) > > ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
