[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote
Title: RE: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote
Is that the only setting you actually changed to get it to work?
What are you using securemote 'behind'?
Thanks Chris.
Jarrett
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Trudeau [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 11:45
To: Travis Guinn
Cc: 'Guillaume, Reginald'; Worldwide Support (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote
4.2SP2 works with SR 4165. enable force_udp_encapsulation (true)
Works beautifully...
Travis Guinn wrote:
> If you are using NAT with your DSL modem you may have a very tough
> time getting SR to work. It was said that version 4.1 SP2 and the
> latest SR will work behind a NATed device but I have not seen it yet.
> Other wise I don't think SR will work from behind any other router or
> firewall performing NAT or masquerading.HTH Travis Guinn
> MCSE/CCSE/CCA/A+
> Data Transit, Intl - Dallas
> 1999 #1 Citrix Integrator Nationwide
> vf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guillaume, Reginald [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 6:17 PM
> To: Worldwide Support (E-mail)
> Subject: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote
> Sensitivity: Personal
>
> Hello there, Do you guys knows of any "DSL Router
> Modems" that would work perfectly with secure remote. I've
> Been using a routing softwarecalled freesco acting like a
> Cisco router using "IP masquerading" andI am not getting
> thru using FWZ even with all the needed ports(udp259,500-
> tcp256,264 and protocol 94,50,51) open. ALL
> INPUTS WILL BE APPRECIATED, Thanks.
>
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
