RE: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote

[Thomas.Poole@FW1-NOSPAMgecits.ge.com]

using NAT on both ends, you will not get fwz to work. NAT and fwz make a very bitter drink when mixed.

 

Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: Guillaume, Reginald [mailto:rguillaume@netegrity.com]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 7:17 PM
To: Worldwide Support (E-mail)
Subject: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote
Sensitivity: Personal

Hello there,

            Do you guys knows of any "DSL Router Modems" that would

work perfectly with secure remote. I've Been using a routing software

called freesco acting like a Cisco router using "IP masquerading" and

I am not getting thru using FWZ even with all the needed ports

(udp259,500- tcp256,264 and protocol 94,50,51) open.

 

            ALL INPUTS WILL BE APPRECIATED, Thanks.